Public Comment on Marvin Nichols Reservoir Study Taken Through Friday

By Karl Richter

Texarkana Gazette, November 29, 2023

Those who want to add their comments to a study of the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir are running out of time.

Friday is the final day that the Texas Water Development Board will accept public comments for its feasibility review of the reservoir, which the Texas Legislature ordered this year.

Those submitting information to be considered in the feasibility review may provide input on the implementation timeline, associated costs, land acquisition considerations and/or economic impact, according to a news release from Preserve Northeast Texas, an activist group that opposes construction of the reservoir.

Commenters may email their input and any supporting documentation to TWDB at feasibility@twdb.texas.gov. Preserve Northeast Texas has also created an online form to facilitate commenting.

“While the Marvin Nichols Reservoir has been under discussion for decades, opponents have thus far been able to successfully push back against the largest planned land-grab in recent Texas history. This is a chance to let water planners know why Marvin Nichols is an outdated solution to our modern water challenges and to hear the stories of what will be lost if the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir is allowed to be built,” the release stated.

The reservoir would be on the main stem of the Sulphur River in Red River, Titus and Franklin counties. It would flood more than 66,000 acres of ranch land, hardwood forest and wetlands in Northeast Texas to pipe water 150 miles to the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. It also would require that at least another 130,000 acres be taken from private ownership for mitigation purposes.

The cost estimate for the project is about $4.58 billion, with material costs rising steadily.

The reservoir was adopted by water planners based on a predicted strain to the DFW water supply. The prediction is based not only on expected population growth, but also continued high per capita water use.

The target date for completion of the reservoir was moved forward in the state water plan in summer 2021 from 2070 to 2050.

County Leaders Voice Opposition to Reservoir Project

By Kenny Mitchell

Bowie County Citizens Tribune, November 29, 2023

Bowie County commissioners took another stand against the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir this week as they passed a formal resolution voicing their opposition to the lake’s construction. The resolution adds Bowie County to the ever-growing list of those opposing the proposed construction of the massive reservoir in the Sulphur River Basin. That opposition includes District 1 State Representative Gary VanDeaver. Texas Governor Gregg Abbott also voiced his concerns about the project earlier this year.

The action by Bowie County leaders comes as the time period for those opposed to the reservoir to send comments to the Texas Water Development Board comes to an end. Comments to the TWDB in opposition to Marvin Nichols must be received by Thursday, December 1. To make your voice heard, send your comments to the TWDB at feasibility@ twdb.texas.gov In February, while doing an interview with CBS 19 in Tyler, the Texas Governor stated, ““There are water needs, whether it be in the Dallas area or even in the Tyler area,” Abbott said. “But what we must do, we must explore other options before we start taking people’s lands or flooding property that’s been around for literally centuries.”

Vandeaver is on record as stating, “Roughly 66,000 of private land would be used to build this reservoir, but at least an additional 130,000 acres of land [would be] taken out of production and out of private hands,” he said at the time. “This would make the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir one of the most expensive public works projects and one of the largest land grabs by eminent domain in Texas history.”

VanDeaver was instrumental in state lawmakers calling for a feasibility study on the proposed reservoir. That feasibility study is to include and analysis of the implementation timeline, associated costs, land acquisition considerations, and the economic impact of the proposed reservoir. He posted a Youtube video this past week urging his constituents to take advantage of the opportunity to send comments to the TWDB. That video can be seen at https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=_kvjR3Dw3J8 When HB1 was passed earlier with the feasibility study included, longtime Region D water planner and opponent of the reservoir’s construction Jim Palmer stated, “I’m so pleased lawmakers heard our pleas and are calling on the Texas Water Development Board to take a critical look at this controversial plan. We are grateful that Representative VanDeaver pushed for this study and is putting the plight of Northeast Texans front and center for lawmakers. I look forward to participating in this study and doing all I can to ensure it leads to the ultimate removal of this devastating reservoir from the State Water Plan.”

The resolution against the reservoir that was passed on Monday by the Bowie County Commissioners Court reads, “A RESOLUTION OF THE BOWIE COUNTY COMMISSIONER’S COURT, OPPOSING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPOSED MARVIN NICHOLS RESERVOIR; REQUESTING REMOVAL OF THE PROJECT FROM THE STATEWIDE WATER PLAN; URGING THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH METROPLEX TO UTILIZE CONSERVATION, REUSE, AND EXISTING WATER RESOURCES FOR THEIR REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY.

WHEREAS, the 88th Texas Legislature passed, and Governor Abbot signed into law HB1, the State Budget, which ordered a feasibility study of the Marvin Nichols project; and WHEREAS, the Texas Water Development Board has initiated the feasibility study to analyze the implementation timeline, associated costs, land acquisition considerations, and the economic impact of the proposed project; and WHEREAS, the Marvin Nichols Reservoir, proposed on the main stem of the Sulphur River in Red River, Titus and Franklin Counties would flood approximately 66,000 acres of hardwood and upland forest, pasture and farmland, and wetlands; and WHEREAS, an estimated 130,000 additional acres would be removed from private land ownership for mitigation required by the federal government; and WHEREAS, this project would force local property owners off thousands of acres of family lands, drown resources that would devastate the timber and agriculture-based economy in the region, negatively impact wildlife habitat and inundate archaeological and historic sites and cemeteries; and WHEREAS, those promoting the reservoir can use eminent domain to force one of the biggest transfers of private land to public in modern history; and WHEREAS, the private land lost to the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir would negatively impact local tax bases and jeopardize funding for our schools and communities; and WHEREAS, reducing the watershed of the Sulphur River Basin would negatively impact existing manufacturing operations and could make it difficult to attract new industry to the region; and WHEREAS, at least 80 percent of the water would be piped 150 miles to the Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex, a region that could do more to conserve water and leverage existing sources of water regionally; and WHEREAS, the time frame for development of the project has been moved forward in the 2022 State Water Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir poses a serious threat to the people, economy, and wildlife habitat of Northeast Texas.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: BOWIE COUNTY COMMISSIONER’S COURT IS OPPOSED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARVIN NICHOLS RESERVOIR, REQUESTS THAT THE PROJECT BE REMOVED FROM THE STATEWIDE WATER PLAN, AND THAT THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH METROPLEX (REGION C) UTILIZE CONSERVATION, REUSE AND ALTERNATIVE, EXISTING WATER RESOURCES FOR ITS REGIONALWATER SUPPLY.

APPROVED this the 27th day of November,

State-Ordered Feasibility Review of Marvin Nichols Prompts Urgent Comment Period

The Gilmer Mirror, November 29, 2023

NORTHEAST TEXAS —A new development in the decades-long fight over a proposed reservoir in Northeast  Texas is offering Texans a chance to speak out in defense of private property and against the use of eminent  domain for an unnecessary, outdated water project. The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) is  conducting a feasibility review of the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir. This comes after State  Representative Gary VanDeaver requested the review as part of House Bill 1, which passed the Legislature  earlier this year.  

“People in my District deserve the right to be heard by state leaders,” said VanDeaver. “Too often rural  Texans are left behind while the spotlight shines on the needs of our large urban neighbors. I fought for the  Legislature to include this important review, and I hope everyone will speak out about how the timeline, cost  and economic impact of Marvin Nichols would impact them and our overall community.”  

To gather material for the review, the TWDB has provided a window of opportunity from now until December  1, 2023. The TWDB requests submission of meaningful input and information. This is an important time for those opposing the reservoir to make their voice heard – and to do so quickly. To aid in this effort, Preserve  Northeast Texas has created a simple online form that will help you share your message directly with TWDB.  You can find the link at: https://bit.ly/NoMarvinNichols 

Those submitting information to be considered in the feasibility review may provide input on the following  topics by December 1, 2023: 

  1. Implementation timeline 
  2. Associated costs 
  3. Land acquisition considerations 
  4. Economic impact 

While the Marvin Nichols Reservoir has been under discussion for decades, opponents have thus far been  able to successfully push back against the largest planned land-grab in recent Texas history. This is a chance  to let water planners know why Marvin Nichols is an outdated solution to our modern water challenges and  to hear the stories of what wil be lost if the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir is allowed to be built.  

About Preserve Northeast Texas: The Preserve Northeast Texas Steering Committee includes: Cass  County Judge Travis Ransom, Bill Ward, Jim Thompson, Max Shumake, Shirley Shumake, Linda Price, Richard  LeTourneau, Cynthia Gwinn, Gary Cheatwood, and Janice Bezanson. Residents of Northeast Texas as well as  supporting Texans are invited to join the campaign and subscribe to the newsletter.  

Learn more about Preserve Northeast Texas: Stop Marvin Nichols online at  

www.PreserveNortheastTexas.org, and follow the campaign on Facebook and Instagram at  @PreserveNortheastTexas and Twitter (X) @NoMarvinNichols. 

Texans Urged to Speak Out Against Marvin Nichols Reservoir: Deadline for Input December 1st

By Jeff Easterling

Texarkana FYI, November 28, 2023

In a significant development in the prolonged battle over the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir in Northeast Texas, the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) is opening the floor for public input regarding the controversial water project. The deadline is Friday, December 1.

The TWDB is currently conducting a feasibility review, as per the request of State Representative Gary VanDeaver, who championed the cause through House Bill 1 earlier this year.

Representative VanDeaver emphasized the importance of rural voices in the decision-making process, stating, “People in my District deserve the right to be heard by state leaders. Too often rural Texans are left behind while the spotlight shines on the needs of our large urban neighbors.”

To facilitate public participation, the TWDB has established a window for input from now until December 1, 2023. The call for submissions invites Texans to share their perspectives on critical aspects of the proposed reservoir, including the implementation timeline, associated costs, land acquisition considerations, and the economic impact.

In a bid to streamline the input process, Preserve Northeast Texas has created an online form accessible at https://bit.ly/NoMarvinNichols. This platform allows concerned citizens to convey their thoughts directly to the TWDB.

The Marvin Nichols Reservoir, a subject of discussion for decades, has faced opposition from those who view it as an unnecessary and outdated solution to current water challenges. The reservoir has been criticized for potentially being the largest planned land-grab in recent Texas history.

Preserve Northeast Texas, led by a dedicated Steering Committee, encourages residents and supporting Texans to engage in the campaign against Marvin Nichols. The committee, which includes figures such as Cass County Judge Travis Ransom, Bill Ward, and Linda Price, invites the public to subscribe to their newsletter for updates.

To contribute to the feasibility review, individuals can address key topics, including the implementation timeline, associated costs, land acquisition considerations, and economic impact, by December 1, 2023.

For more information on the campaign and to stay informed, visit www.PreserveNortheastTexas.org. This is a crucial opportunity for concerned citizens to make their voices heard and shape the future of the Marvin Nichols Reservoir project.

Morris County Joins Opposition to Controversial Marvin Nichols Reservoir

East Texas Radio, November 13, 2023

Northeast Texas (November 13, 2023) — Morris County Commissioners have unanimously passed a resolution opposing the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir. Morris joins Red River and Cass counties in formalizing their opposition to the project, which has been discussed for decades but has moved closer to development in recent years.

 “Marvin Nichols would take more than 200,000 acres of private land out of the hands of hardworking Texans,” said Jim Thompson, a Preserve Northeast Texas Steering Committee member. “This reservoir would rob Northeast Texans of land, valuable jobs, and precious water resources, devastating our region’s economy and especially our timber industry, the region’s leading economic driver. I am so proud to see the growing opposition by our local elected officials to this outdated, unnecessary project. I am grateful to Morris County for sending a strong message of opposition to Marvin Nichols.”

This opposition comes as the Texas Water Development Board conducts a feasibility review of Marvin Nichols. The Texas Legislature has required the Board to review the reservoir in what some view as a step toward ending the project. Texans can weigh in on Marvin Nichols through December 1, 2023, by visiting https://bit.ly/NoMarvinNichols.

The proposed reservoir would be on the main stem of the Sulphur River. It would flood over 66,000 acres of heritage farmland, hardwood forest, and wetlands in Northeast Texas to pipe water 150 miles to the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. An additional Marvin Nichols would take 130,000 acres from private ownership to mitigate wildlife habitat losses created by the reservoir. It would force thousands of Texans to sell their lands, some of which have been in their families since the 1800s.

Rather than looking into viable solutions through conservation efforts and existing reservoirs, North Texas water planners proposed the lake to meet their projected water demands. The target date for completion has recently been moved forward in the State Water Plan from 2070 to 2050 at a projected cost of at least $4.4 billion.

To learn more about the proposed water project, visit PreserveNortheastTexas.org. The organization’s website offers downloadable information for advocates and tips on how others can get involved to oppose the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir.

Press Release: MORRIS COUNTY JOINS GROWING OPPOSITION TO CONTROVERSIAL MARVIN NICHOLS RESERVOIR

NORTHEAST TEXAS (November 13, 2023) — Morris County Commissioners have unanimously passed a resolution opposing the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir. Morris joins both Red River and Cass counties in formalizing their opposition to the project, which has been discussed for decades but has moved closer to development in recent years.

“Marvin Nichols would take more than 200,000 acres of private land out of the hands of hardworking Texans,” said Jim Thompson, a member of the Preserve Northeast Texas Steering Committee. “This reservoir would rob Northeast Texans of land, valuable jobs, and precious water resources, devastating our region’s economy and especially our timber industry, the region’s leading economic driver. I am so proud to see the growing opposition by our local elected officials to this outdated, unnecessary project and am grateful to Morris County for sending a strong message of opposition to Marvin Nichols.”

This opposition comes as the Texas Water Development Board is conducting a feasibility review of Marvin Nichols. The Texas Legislature has required the Board to review the reservoir in what some view as a step toward ending the project. Texans can weigh in on Marvin Nichols through December 1, 2023, by visiting: https://bit.ly/NoMarvinNichols

The proposed reservoir would be located on the main stem of the Sulphur River and would flood more than 66,000 acres of heritage farmland, hardwood forest and wetlands in Northeast Texas to pipe water 150 miles to the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. An additional 130,000 acres would be taken from private ownership to mitigate wildlife habitat losses created by the reservoir. Thousands of Texans will be forced to sell their lands, some of which has been in their families since the 1800s. 

Rather than look into viable solutions through conservation efforts and existing reservoirs, North Texas water planners chose to propose the reservoir to meet their projected water demands. The target date for completion has recently been moved forward in the State Water Plan from 2070 to 2050 at a projected cost of at least $4.4 billion.

To learn more about the proposed water project, visit PreserveNortheastTexas.org. The organization’s website offers downloadable information for advocates, in addition to tips on how others can get involved to oppose the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir.

DFW wants controversial reservoir. Northeast Texans hope new study will build opposition

By Haley Samsel

Fort Worth Report, November 12, 2023

J. Kevin Ward expected a bigger crowd. 

As the longtime chair of Dallas-Fort Worth’s regional water planning group, Ward has been in rooms with hundreds of northeast Texans upset over the group’s proposal to flood 66,000 acres of hardwood forest for a massive new reservoir along the Sulphur River. 

He recalls breaking bread with a few opponents, sitting down to explain why North Texas water planners believe the controversial Marvin Nichols reservoir is necessary to create enough water supply for the region’s explosive population growth. 

Marvin Nichols was on the agenda at a Nov. 6 water planning meeting in Arlington, but opportunities for public comment came and went.

“I’d have thought we’d have a more robust discussion,” Ward, general manager of the Trinity River Authority, said. “I don’t know in the long run how this will work for them, if it will ever get built. That’s going to be up to a lot of factors going forward. We don’t even know if we’re going to have it in the (future) water plan yet.”

Widespread opposition to the reservoir stems from concern over residents being forced to sell their land to the state through an eminent domain process and the impact on the region’s timber industry.

Thanks to a study ordered by the Texas Legislature, the decades-long debate over the reservoir’s potential to permanently alter the face of northeast Texas is entering its next chapter. 

The Texas Water Development Board will analyze the feasibility of Marvin Nichols by examining the project’s timeline, associated costs, land acquisition considerations and economic impact on the region. Officials estimate the reservoir would cost $4.4 billion to build.

“We consider this feasibility review to be an important step,” said Janice Bezanson, senior policy director for the environmental advocacy group Texas Conservation Alliance. “This really matters in terms of building that understanding that this is not the way to go, and we need to be figuring out the best way to go without considering taking this much land out of production and taking this much land away from the current owners.” 

The water development board will deliver a report to the Legislature and Gov. Greg Abbott by Jan. 5, 2025, the beginning of that year’s legislative session. The agency will accept “meaningful input” from residents, along with supporting documentation, through Dec. 1, 2023. 

Opponents of Marvin Nichols hope this will draw more attention and legislative opposition to the reservoir, first introduced in the 1960s. Dallas-Fort Worth’s 2021 water plan sets a 2050 completion date for the project, while the northeast planning group recommends against building it before exploring other strategies, including alternate water supply options and water conservation measures. 

Because federal permits often take decades to obtain, local project sponsors — including the Tarrant Regional Water District — must start the process over the next few years to bring the reservoir online by 2050. 

In addition to the 66,000 acres for the reservoir, the state would have to acquire at least 130,000 more acres to mitigate the loss of wildlife habitat and meet federal requirements. 

Bezanson said there’s still time to prevent that outcome. She serves on the steering committee of Preserve Northeast Texas, an opposition campaign formed in 2021

The average Dallas-Fort Worth resident doesn’t understand how heavily the prospect of Marvin Nichols weighs on landowners near Mount Pleasant, Bezanson said. North Texans turn on their faucet, water comes out, and they have no reason to ask how. 

“But the people in the Dallas-Fort Worth area are not going to want to cause these impacts if there’s any other way to do it,” she said. “You’re taking people’s homes and you’re destroying an entire river watershed to water lawns in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. And there are better ways to do that.” 

Bezanson’s organization wants planners to explore storing more water underground, creating more opportunities for water reuse and making a stronger push for water conservation in North Texas. 

However, Ward’s position has stayed the same: His region requires another reservoir to sustain rapid population growth, and Marvin Nichols is the best opportunity to meet that need. 

The latest feasibility study won’t resolve differences between the two regions, Ward said. At their Nov. 6 meeting, Dallas-Fort Worth water planners voted to send their previous studies on Marvin Nichols, including its economic impact, cost and timeline, to the Texas Water Development Board. 

They asked the state to consider the negative economic impact of failing to meet water needs in North Texas. Some Marvin Nichols supporters also point to economic development opportunities stemming from the creation of waterfront property and new recreation attractions. 

Ward also awaits a decision from the three local sponsors — the Tarrant Regional Water District, the Upper Trinity Regional Water District and North Texas Municipal Water District — on whether they want to continue pursuing Marvin Nichols. 

Those agencies are reviewing data on the baseline amount of water that the reservoir will produce and if that yield will be worth the cost of moving forward. Ward expects a decision by next spring. 

“That’s why we haven’t engaged in any coordination with us and the other regions, because I don’t want to get engaged in any coordination on something that may never occur,” Ward said. “I don’t know what these folks want to do yet. They haven’t decided, so we’re just waiting.” 

In the meantime, Bezanson wants to keep Marvin Nichols front of mind for legislators and the general public. While property owners in the reservoir area would be paid for their land, northeast Texans never want to see that prospect become a reality, she said. 

“It reaches into every aspect of society to do a project this massive,” Bezanson said. “How do you compensate someone for having the home they grew up in destroyed and being forced to move out of it? How do you compensate somebody for the fact that the cemetery where their grandparents are buried is now under water? There’s no compensating for that.”

 

Haley Samsel is the environmental reporter for the Fort Worth Report. You can reach them at haley.samsel@fortworthreport.org.

At the Fort Worth Report, news decisions are made independently of our board members and financial supporters. Read more about our editorial independence policy here.

Texas is taking my land to build an unnecessary lake

By Deborah Clark

Dallas Morning News, October 20, 2023

Texas is a proud private-property state. Ownership and stewardship of land are lauded, celebrated and written into our state’s storied history. But what if the government was taking your land and there was nothing you could do about it? What if you were threatened with having the prairie, cattle and wildlife that shape your environment and provide your livelihood taken away?

For nearly a decade I’ve been fighting an uphill battle to keep my ranch from being taken by the government and drowned. I’ve fought alongside my fellow ranchers and neighbors whose property is being threatened by the government’s use of eminent domain.

In a few short weeks an administrative judge will make a recommendation which may ultimately decide whether we get to keep our land. We’re participating in a contested case we brought against water developers and the city of Wichita Falls who claim to need a reservoir — dubbed Lake Ringgold —that would permanently flood some 16,000 acres of productive agricultural land and take a total of as many as 40,000 acres out of production in our region, according to Texas Water Development Board planning documents.

Wichita Falls doesn’t need Lake Ringgold. Its current water supplies are adequate to meet demands for at least the next 50 years. And Wichita Falls is not growing. It was the only one of Texas’ 10 biggest metro areas that lost population in the last census. The Texas Demographic Center projects its population will continue to decline.

During the hearing we were told the impact on landowners is not relevant in a contested case hearing and is not considered in a feasibility study. But the negative impact on our properties and community is at the very heart of this debate.

If building a reservoir came with no negative impact, it wouldn’t matter if Wichita Falls built an unnecessary reservoir. But the people of Wichita Falls and surrounding communities will face a $442 million price tag for Lake Ringgold. The tremendous negative economic, social, and environmental impact will be devastating and irreversible to our entire region.

I believe all of us — urban and rural community members — share the same goal of a vibrant, thriving Texas and Texoma region. But building a reservoir we don’t need doesn’t help anyone.

Wichita Falls has been a pioneer in water reuse. During the 2011-15 drought, it made headlines and won an award for its efforts to cope with the drought and prepare for future times — like now — that are hotter and drier. But today the city claims it is a hardship for residents to limit lawn watering to just twice a week.

When a project that is unnecessary, environmentally damaging and would cost nearly half a billion dollars is proposed, you have to look at who stands to gain if the reservoir goes forward. The city has said no engineering company has been contracted for this project. But one company has been pushing it since the 1950s: Freese and Nichols. They produce studies that say this reservoir is necessary. Estimates like these inflate the city’s water demand figures and undercount its supply by excluding 20% of existing reservoir water from available resources. That’s two years’ worth.

Freese and Nichols testified as experts for the city in the hearing, claiming that landowners would be adequately compensated by the reservoir. But what, pray tell, is adequate compensation for five generations on the land?

Lake Ringgold would forever drown homes, ranches, cemeteries, historic structures, archaeological sites, most of the remaining woodlands left in Clay County and 165 miles of river and creeks. It would force more than 25 Texas ranching families like mine to sell all or part of the land that provides their livelihoods and their homes.

It is easy to ignore arduous administrative proceedings like the ones my neighbors and I are going through. A reservoir miles away from your home probably doesn’t feel like something to be concerned about.

But what if it were your land?

 

Deborah Clark is a cattle rancher and co-owner of Birdwell & Clark Ranch in Clay County, Texas. She wrote this column for The Dallas Morning News.

State-ordered feasibility review of Marvin Nichols prompts urgent comment period

By News Staff

Mount Pleasant Tribune, October 24, 2023

NORTHEAST TEXAS —A new development in the decades-long fight over a proposed reservoir in Northeast Texas is offering Texans a chance to speak out in defense of private property and against the use of eminent domain for an unnecessary, outdated water project. The Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) is conducting a feasibility review of the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir. This comes after State Representative Gary VanDeaver requested the review as part of House Bill 1, which passed the Legislature earlier this year.

“People in my District deserve the right to be heard by state leaders,” said VanDeaver. “Too often rural Texans are left behind while the spotlight shines on the needs of our large urban neighbors. I fought for the Legislature to include this important review, and I hope everyone will speak out about how the timeline, cost and economic impact of Marvin Nichols would impact them and our overall community.” 

To gather material for the review, the TWDB has provided a window of opportunity from now until December 1, 2023. The TWDB requests submission of meaningful input and information. This is an important time for those opposing the reservoir to make their voice heard – and to do so quickly. To aid in this effort, Preserve Northeast Texas has created a simple online form that will help you share your message directly with TWDB. You can find the link at: https://bit.ly/NoMarvinNichols

Those submitting information to be considered in the feasibility review may provide input on the following topics by December 1, 2023:

1.  Implementation timeline 

2.  Associated costs 

3.  Land acquisition considerations 

4.  Economic impact

While the Marvin Nichols Reservoir has been under discussion for decades, opponents have thus far been able to successfully push back against the largest planned land-grab in recent Texas history. This is a chance to let water planners know why Marvin Nichols is an outdated solution to our modern water challenges and to hear the stories of what will be lost if the proposed Marvin Nichols Reservoir is allowed to be built.

About Preserve Northeast Texas: The Preserve Northeast Texas Steering Committee includes: Cass County Judge Travis Ransom, Bill Ward, Jim Thompson, Max Shumake, Shirley Shumake, Linda Price, Richard LeTourneau, Cynthia Gwinn, Gary Cheatwood, and Janice Bezanson.Residents of Northeast Texas as well as supporting Texans are invited to join the campaign and subscribe to the newsletter.

Learn more about Preserve Northeast Texas: Stop Marvin Nichols online at www.PreserveNortheastTexas.org, and follow the campaign on Facebook and Instagram at @PreserveNortheastTexas and Twitter (X) @NoMarvinNichols.

What’s your opinion on the Marvin Nichols Reservoir? Texas takes public comment

By Eleanor Dearman

Yahoo News, October 19, 2023

The state is taking public comment on the Marvin Nichols Reservoir project after a legislative win for opponents of the proposed 66,000-acre impoundment in northeast Texas that would provide water to the Metroplex.

The project along the Sulphur River would flood thousands of acres of bottomland hardwood forest in Cuthand. It was given a feasibility study in Texas’ latest budget. As part of the study, the Texas Water Development Board is taking public comment through Dec. 1.

The study came after pushback from advocates with Preserve Northeast Texas and gives those with concerns about the project time to make their opinion known. The review is looking at the project’s timeline, costs, land acquisition and economic impact, and the board is seeking comments on those subjects.

“People in my District deserve the right to be heard by state leaders,” said Rep. Gary Vandeaver, a New Boston Republican, in a statement “Too often rural Texans are left behind while the spotlight shines on the needs of our large urban neighbors. I fought for the Legislature to include this important review, and I hope everyone will speak out about how the timeline, cost and economic impact of Marvin Nichols would impact them and our overall community.”

The statement was sent in a Thursday news release from Preserve Northeast Texas.

Supporters say the project is needed to help address North Texas’ water needs as its population booms.

Comments can be emailed to feasibility@twdb.texas.gov.

The report will be submitted to Gov. Greg Abbott and the Legislative Budget Board by Jan. 5, 2025.

What’s your opinion on the Marvin Nichols Reservoir? Texas takes public comment

By Eleanor Dearman

Fort Worth Star Telegram, October 19, 2023

The state is taking public comment on the Marvin Nichols Reservoir project after a legislative win for opponents of the proposed 66,000-acre impoundment in northeast Texas that would provide water to the Metroplex.

The project along the Sulphur River would flood thousands of acres of bottomland hardwood forest in Cuthand. It was given a feasibility study in Texas’ latest budget. As part of the study, the Texas Water Development Board is taking public comment through Dec. 1.

The study came after pushback from advocates with Preserve Northeast Texas and gives those with concerns about the project time to make their opinion known. The review is looking at the project’s timeline, costs, land acquisition and economic impact, and the board is seeking comments on those subjects.

“People in my District deserve the right to be heard by state leaders,” said Rep. Gary Vandeaver, a New Boston Republican, in a statement “Too often rural Texans are left behind while the spotlight shines on the needs of our large urban neighbors. I fought for the Legislature to include this important review, and I hope everyone will speak out about how the timeline, cost and economic impact of Marvin Nichols would impact them and our overall community.”

The statement was sent in a Thursday news release from Preserve Northeast Texas.

Supporters say the project is needed to help address North Texas’ water needs as its population booms.

Comments can be emailed to feasibility@twdb.texas.gov.

The report will be submitted to Gov. Greg Abbott and the Legislative Budget Board by Jan. 5, 2025.